9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Put any topics that do not fit elsewhere in this forum. A good place to just BS.

Moderators: skeetshot, deerhunter338mag

WDMTex
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:26 pm
Location: USA

9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by WDMTex »

Hi, I'm new to Blaser and have an R8 9.2 X 62 that I acquired with my Professional Success. I'm not familiar with the 9.3 X 62. I'm heading moose hunting in eastern Canada and the outfitter is saying that it won't have the stopping power required beyond a couple of hundred yards. He's recommended that I bring at least a 300 WM. A friend suggested I ask for opinions on that here.

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

9.3x62 has plenty of power for 200m on just about anything. 💪
I wouldn't hesitate to take one.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

User avatar
Vaughan
Moderator
Posts: 3626
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:43 pm
Location: Northern Sweden

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by Vaughan »

FWIW, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot a Scandi moose out to 250m with my 9.3x62. I don't think I've actually shot one with it beyond 230m but near enough. If you might reasonably go beyond that, I would be happier with the 300wm as well but I'm sure the 9.3 would still work. The buggers always run anyway :-)
/Vaughan

Real dogs have beards

MM
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1303
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Location: Ohio
Location: Ohio

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by MM »

I shot an Alaskan moose with a 9.3x74R ( ballistic ally identical to 9.3x62) it killed the moose just fine. Trajectory and expansion may be problematic past 300 yards.
Matt

Rod
Meister der jagd
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 1:01 am
Location: Brisbane
Location: Queensland, AUSTRALIA

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by Rod »

As MM said past 300 yards trajectory and expansion may be an issue.

So if there’s a good chance that shots will be in excess of 300 yards then the 300WM would be my choice (that’s if you don’t have a 30/06 :D )

I should also add, that border closures dependent, I’m booked for a NW Canada moose hunt in 2022. I’m taking my 30/06 barrel loaded with 180 grain partitions. Mainly because I can expect longer shots and maybe I’ll also get a chance at a goat.

Cheers
Rod

9.3x64
Meister der jagd
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:37 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by 9.3x64 »

Are you handloading?
If you are just load Barnes 250 grain and use the 9.3.
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog.
Hunt with a German Shorthaired Pointer.

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

I'd go the 250gn Accubond, but I Gus's it's on of those 6 of one things, but the accubond has a good BC but both will keep up with a 338win mag out to about 250m, then the higher BC of the 338 starts to gain.

But I've kills plenty of goats back in the day out to 300m with factory 286gn loads, but it did have a good but of drop. But I'm sure if I could pole axe goats at that range, 200m on a moose would be a much easier shot.
I did find 250m to be the butter zone maximum range, out to there it was pretty easy and I only zeroed 1.5" high at 100m.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

User avatar
stokesrj
Moderator
Posts: 5977
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: USA
Location: Mesa AZ, USA

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by stokesrj »

Your outfitter is ill informed, I have killed moose with both 300 WinMag and the 9.3X62 and found the 9.3X62 more decisive, although either is good enough. Many African countries allow the 9.3X62 to be used on thick skinned dangerous game where they do not allow the 300 WinMag.
As to range, the 300 Win Mag will have an edge beyond 350 yards, but it is a poor outfitter that plans on his clients shooting that far. I've shot my 9.3X62 out to 600 yards and accuracy was fine, but velocity is below minimum expansion threshold. For that reason I would limit shots to under 400 yards with the 250 grain Nosler Accubond.
Here is a thread I put together on the subject a few years ago. https://www.blaserbuds.com/forum/viewto ... long+range
Robert J Stokes

User avatar
mchughcb
Moderator
Posts: 11334
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:55 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by mchughcb »

A 6.3x92. What sort of action is that?

dchamp
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1189
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:42 pm
Location: USA
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by dchamp »

I have only taken Moose in British Columbia at 70 yds and Black Bear at 150 yds with the 9.3x62, 250gr TTSX. My son has taken Black Wildebeest in Africa with the 9.3x62, 250gr TTSX, at 300 yds. Our muzzle velocities ranged from 2500-2550fps. You should have no problems out to 350-400 yds.
I have never met a man so ignorant that I couldn't learn something from him. Galileo

The fact that Jellyfish have survived 650 million years, despite not having brains, gives hope to many people. sun-gazing.com

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

mchughcb wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 9:23 pm A 6.3x92. What sort of action is that?
An extra long one. :lol:
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

MM
Meister der jagd
Posts: 1303
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Location: Ohio
Location: Ohio

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by MM »

You shouldn’t have a problem getting within 300 yards of a moose. My guide told me to leave the 300 at home and bring the 9.3. I hand load the 286 grn. Partition and 300 yards is my limit with that load because I am worried about reliable expansion past that point.
Matt

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

I liked the 286gn partition too, it works at close range and right out, as far as the various 9.3's can launch them anyway.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

WDMTex
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:26 pm
Location: USA

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by WDMTex »

SPEEDY wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 1:47 am
mchughcb wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 9:23 pm A 6.3x92. What sort of action is that?
An extra long one. :lol:
A dyslexic one. 9.3X62 but I haven't been able to figure out how to edit my posts. :D

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 6.3 X 92 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

WDMTex wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 10:48 am
SPEEDY wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 1:47 am
mchughcb wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 9:23 pm A 6.3x92. What sort of action is that?
An extra long one. :lol:
A dyslexic one. 9.3X62 but I haven't been able to figure out how to edit my posts. :D
Fixed for you. :lol:
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

Post Reply

Return to “Open discussion”