9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Put any topics that do not fit elsewhere in this forum. A good place to just BS.

Moderators: skeetshot, deerhunter338mag

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10022
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by deerhunter338mag »

I have both and the 9.3x62 is just an amazing cal. There's nothing really you can't hunt with it. I've shot out to 500m with it and was surprisingly very accurate with the 250gr Noslers accubonds. I've loaded the 286gn, 250gr rnsn and the hydro's in woodleigh. Also the good old Tug"s or their new name now, the uni classic. I've taking a few deer with them no problems at all. The 300 win bag is also a handy cal as it gives you a bit of legs with a strong amount of punch if needed and is also an ok cal for walking around as well.
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

Rod wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 1:42 am
SPEEDY wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 1:11 am I find the 30/06 and 9.3x62 make a great pair of old timers. A perfect match for the discerning travelling hunter.
The 300win definitely has more legs, but I see as more for the hunting shooter then the hunting stalker. 😜
Your wiser than you look Speedy :clap:

Rod :lol: :whistle:
That ain't hard. :lol:
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

fares226
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:28 am
Location: United States

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by fares226 »

I think the 300wm have a better BC and will be more efficient for longer ranges

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

By a long way, but at regular hunting ranges the 9.3 still has the edge in my book.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

9.3x64
Meister der jagd
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:37 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by 9.3x64 »

SPEEDY wrote: Sat Jun 05, 2021 8:22 pm By a long way, but at regular hunting ranges the 9.3 still has the edge in my book.
Yeah I agree.
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog.
Hunt with a German Shorthaired Pointer.

User avatar
9.3M03
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:26 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by 9.3M03 »

A less popular round which kind of sits between is the 8 x 68s. I have all 3 and rate them all

User avatar
stokesrj
Moderator
Posts: 5977
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 12:41 pm
Location: USA
Location: Mesa AZ, USA

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by stokesrj »

I chose the 300 Win Mag over the 9.3X62 when I minimized my Blaser Barrel collection to just four calibers. But I wish I would have shot my Bison with the 9.3X62 rather than the 300 Win Mag. Although the 300 Win Mag with a 200 grain Nosler Partition did the job, the 9.3X62 with a 286 grain Nosler Partition would have been superior. I don't think the 300 Win Mag has anything to offer until ranges get beyond 350 yards.
Robert J Stokes

User avatar
Vaughan
Moderator
Posts: 3626
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:43 pm
Location: Northern Sweden

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by Vaughan »

9.3M03 wrote: Sun Jun 06, 2021 7:45 am A less popular round which kind of sits between is the 8 x 68s. I have all 3 and rate them all
I'm pretty new to the 8x68s but yes, what a round! If I had to clear my safe and keep just one bbl, I might just chose the 8x68s over the 9.3x62. It would be a tough choice. Not sure it does anything the 300wm can't but it does it all with more style :handgestures-thumbup:
/Vaughan

Real dogs have beards

secondtry
Meister der jagd
Posts: 2328
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:22 pm
Location: Victoria Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by secondtry »

SPEEDY wrote: Sat Jun 05, 2021 8:22 pm By a long way, but at regular hunting ranges the 9.3 still has the edge in my book.
Agree. And it's a thick edge. :)

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

I just don't think there's any other round that gives you that much kill for that moderate recoil.
It's definitely stood the test of time, many new rounds come and go pushed aside by the latest thing.
But ye old German hammer just hangs on doing its thing.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

User avatar
deerhunter338mag
Global Moderator
Posts: 10022
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:50 am
Location: Australia
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by deerhunter338mag »

SPEEDY wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:58 am I just don't think there's any other round that gives you that much kill for that moderate recoil.
It's definitely stood the test of time, many new rounds come and go pushed aside by the latest thing.
But ye old German hammer just hangs on doing its thing.
I remember when you couldn't get brass for them and was very hard. Then Winchester brought loaded ammo out and over night it was the new creedmoor of its time.
Measure it, when it’s on the deck

9.3x64
Meister der jagd
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:37 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by 9.3x64 »

SPEEDY wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:58 am I just don't think there's any other round that gives you that much kill for that moderate recoil.
It's definitely stood the test of time, many new rounds come and go pushed aside by the latest thing.
But ye old German hammer just hangs on doing its thing.
Yes you are certainly right. It’s very tolerable to shoot in a standard weight rifle but provides plenty of power to get even the biggest job done.

On another note I remember reading a post made on here by Bob Stokes years ago (I think) regarding about how the 9.3x62 Mauser was used for surprisingly smaller game in Germany than most people would think. It really is very versatile. If I was ever forced to own just one cartridge for big game it would definitely be the 9.3x62 Mauser.
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog.
Hunt with a German Shorthaired Pointer.

User avatar
SPEEDY
Moderator
Posts: 11394
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:50 am
Location: Southern highland- Australia
Location: Albury, NSW, Australia

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by SPEEDY »

deerhunter338mag wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 5:16 am
SPEEDY wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:58 am I just don't think there's any other round that gives you that much kill for that moderate recoil.
It's definitely stood the test of time, many new rounds come and go pushed aside by the latest thing.
But ye old German hammer just hangs on doing its thing.
I remember when you couldn't get brass for them and was very hard. Then Winchester brought loaded ammo out and over night it was the new creedmoor of its time.
Yet the euro ammo is still the standard, now trying to find 9.3x74R cases is pretty slim pickings, I might have to buy another 100-150 to load up reduced cast bullet loads for rolling pigs with.
I figure trailboss and a 290gn pure or close enough anyway lead cast bullet should match or just out do the 44mag with less noise and recoil.
Shame you can't get a 9.3x74R Stutzen barrel for the K95, now that would be the perfect deer stalking rifle in my book.
I'm soft and I don't care. :dance:

cbrook6
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:31 pm
Location: USA

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by cbrook6 »

I don't have any personal experience with the 9.3 but I'm sure it has plenty of power for a Moose. The 300wm would be more forgiving, depending on the load - but I'm also more familiar with that caliber and ballistics, etc.

Vol423
Meister der jagd
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:32 pm
Location: USA
Location: Tennessee

Re: 9.3 X 62 vs 300 WM

Post by Vol423 »

Like a lot of non-Europeans, you guide probably has no experience with the 9.3X62. Take it a give him an education.

Post Reply

Return to “Open discussion”